In the debate over the Constitution, the Bill of Rights was a deal breaker. In this lesson, students learn why the federalists thought the Constitution didn’t need a bill of rights and why the anti-federalists refused to accept the Constitution without one. Students will find out why individual rights was such a big issue, where the concept of a bill of rights came from,and how the Bill of Rights finally got added to the U.S. Constitution.

Got a 1:1 classroom? Download fillable PDF versions of this lesson's materials below, or check out the Google-based resources here.


Partner Resources for this Lesson Plan include:

No Bill of Rights, No Deal - High School - on Nearpod


*Note: One or more of the activities for this lesson is not compatible with Kami viewer at this time. Be sure to check the “Download Resources” button below to use these activities.


Students will be able to:

  • Identify arguments for and against the need for a bill of rights in the U.S. Constitution
  • Explain why the Bill of Rights was added to the U.S. Constitution
  • Describe how the Bill of Rights addresses limited government
  • Relate the arguments over the need for a bill of rights to the wording of the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution
  • Compare and contrast the fears on both sides of the argument over the need for a bill of rights


Downloadable Resources

Resources for this lesson are available in print and digital form. A free teacher account is required to access them.

This Lesson Plan is included in the following units:

Related Resources